Home Outside lawfirms' class-action suit against San Jose landfill stalls
 

Keywords :   


Outside lawfirms' class-action suit against San Jose landfill stalls

2015-02-17 13:10:45| Waste Management - Topix.net

A San Francisco law firm's prior class-action lawsuit over odors allegedly emanating from the Newby Island Landfill and Resource Recovery Park on the Milpitas-San Jose border has stalled, after a judge ruled the existing suit was legally insufficient as presented to the court. In 2012, the Evans Law Firm, in conjunction with Detroit-based Macuga, Liddle & Dubin PC, filed a suit in Santa Clara County Superior Court against Republic Services of Santa Clara County regarding the San Jose landfill at 1601 Dixon Landing Road, on behalf of Milpitans Peter Ng and Dolly Wu, and other unnamed residents.

Tags: san jose suit san jose

Category:Energy and Environment

Latest from this category

All news

17.06Managing a Small Business Through Growth & the Current Economy
17.06How Solid Waste Contracting Will Adapt to the Circular Economy
17.06How to Secure Federal Funding for Sustainable Materials Management
17.06Wasted Food Solutions and Edible Food Recovery Programs for Commercial, Institutional, and Governmental Organizations; ROI of Food Rescue
17.06Comprehensive Solutions to Improve Wasted Food Management and Meet ESG Goals
17.06Achieving Food Waste Reduction through Cross-Sector Collaboration: Lessons from the Pacific Coast Food Waste Commitment
17.06Federal Food Loss and Waste Reduction Initiatives
17.06Not Your Average Food Recovery Program
Energy and Environment »
18.06Mondi Jackson wins 2024 FTA Excellence in Flexography Award
17.06Potential Tropical Cyclone One Public Advisory Number 1
17.06Summary for Potential Tropical Cyclone One (AT1/AL012024)
17.06Potential Tropical Cyclone One Forecast Advisory Number 1
17.06Potential Tropical Cyclone One Graphics
17.06Chemours Appoints Shane Hostetter Chief Financial Officer
17.06Potential Tropical Cyclone One Graphics
17.06Potential Tropical Cyclone One Forecast Discussion Number 1
More »