je.st
news
Tag: ftcs
FTC\'s Final Order in Deceptive Advertising of Anti-Aging Skin Care
2018-04-19 17:48:00| Happi Breaking News
Says TA Sciences lacked scientific evidence to support claims for topical TA-65 for Skin, TA-65MD capsule/powder.
Tags: order
care
final
advertising
FTC's $1.2 Billion Disgorgement Settlement With Cephalon:...
2015-06-03 04:46:32| Biotech - Topix.net
On May 28, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission announced the settlement of its 2008 lawsuit against Cephalon, Inc. , which alleged that Cephalon had made "reverse payments" to four generic drug manufacturers in order to delay sales of generic versions of its branded sleep disorder drug Provigil. According to the FTC, Cephalon had agree to pay the four generic companies a total of more than $300 million, purportedly for the purchase of an active pharmaceutical ingredient, the licensing of intellectual property, and the co-development rights in a new drug.
Tags: billion
settlement
cephalon
ftcs
Teva Agrees to Pay $1.2 Billion in FTC's Pay-For-Delay Suit Against Cephalon
2015-06-01 22:33:23| Biotech - Topix.net
Recently, the FTC announced that it reached a settlement in its pay-for-delay lawsuit, FTC v. Cephalon Inc .
Corrective Action Earns Verizon End to FTC's FiOS Router Investigation
2014-11-15 10:18:28| Telecom - Topix.net
Corrective action taken by Verizon Communications to fix security issues with its FiOS and DSL routers resulted in the FTC closing its investigation to determine whether Verizon's distribution of the routers was an unfair or deceptive practice. According to the FTC, Verizon regularly shipped routers to consumers with the default security set to the outdated WEP standard, which has been known for a decade to have weaknesses that leave users of the routers vulnerable to hackers.
Tags: end
action
investigation
router
Auto Dealer Agrees to Settle FTC's Deceptive Advertising Charges
2014-03-22 03:53:00| Auto Dealers - Topix.net
Courtesy Auto Group of Attleboro, Massachusetts, has agreed to resolve Federal Trade Commission charges that the dealership violated the FTC Act by deceptively advertising that consumers could lease a vehicle for $0 down and specific monthly payments when, in fact, the advertised amounts excluded substantial fees.
Tags: auto
advertising
charges
dealer